Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the pm tree

[Mario Limonciello]

On 3/6/2025 10:52, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, March 6, 2025 7:15:57 AM CET Dhananjay Ugwekar wrote:
> > Hello Stephen,
> >
> > On 3/6/2025 2:58 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > In commit
> > >
> > >    f6c0b7602909 ("cpufreq/amd-pstate: Fix the clamping of perf values")
> > >
> > > Fixes tag
> > >
> > >    Fixes: 305621eb6a8b ("cpufreq/amd-pstate: Modularize perf<->freq conversion")
> > >
> > > has these problem(s):
> > >
> > >    - Target SHA1 does not exist
> > >
> > > Maybe you meant
> > >
> > > Fixes: 620136ced35a ("cpufreq/amd-pstate: Modularize perf<->freq conversion")
> >
> > Yes, you're right, I was referring to that commit,
> > https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/commit/?h=bleeding-edge&id=620136ced35a9329f4d1ea90e51bee2dfd7ee5b0
> >
> > Rafael, will you be able to fix the tag it in your tree?, or should I send the amended patch separately?
>
> No, I'm not, this was pulled from Mario.
>
> Mario, can you please fix this and send a new pull request to me for the
> same material?
>
> Thanks!

The tag WAS right originally, but I the sha changed when I rebased on a 
later RC and I still had the old sha in my tree so I missed it.

I'll make a replacement tag for you and you can repull.

Thanks,