Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] bits: split the definition of the asm and non-asm GENMASK()

[Vincent Mailhol]

On 06/03/2025 at 23:34, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 08:29:52PM +0900, Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay
> wrote:

(...)

> it seems we now have 1 inconsistency that we comment why
> GENMASK_U128() is not available in asm, but we don't comment why
> GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK() is not available there. Maybe move this comment on
> top of GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK().

I will restore the comment in v6 and put it next to the asm definition,
c.f. my reply to Andy.

> Anyway,
> 
>     Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx>

Is this only valid for the first patch or for the full series? If this
is for the full series, would you mind replying to the cover letter with
your review tag?

> thanks for picking up this series.

You are welcome!

> Lucas De Marchi

(...)

Yours sincerely,
Vincent Mailhol