Re: [PATCH] staging: sm750fb: Fix CamelCase variable naming

[Dan Carpenter]

On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 04:40:05PM -0300, Gabriel Lima Luz wrote:
> Em sex, 2025-02-28 às 20:40 +0300, Dan Carpenter escreveu:
> > On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 01:23:54PM -0300, Gabriel Lima Luz wrote:
> > > Adhere to Linux kernel coding style.
> > > 
> > > Reported by checkpatch:
> > > 
> > > CHECK: Avoid CamelCase
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Gabriel Lima Luz <lima.gabriel.luz@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_power.h | 8 ++++----
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_power.h
> > > b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_power.h
> > > index 63c9e8b6ffb3..33e852fe6949 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_power.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_power.h
> > > @@ -3,10 +3,10 @@
> > >  #define DDK750_POWER_H__
> > >  
> > >  enum dpms {
> > > -	crtDPMS_ON = 0x0,
> > > -	crtDPMS_STANDBY = 0x1,
> > > -	crtDPMS_SUSPEND = 0x2,
> > > -	crtDPMS_OFF = 0x3,
> > > +	crt_DPMS_ON = 0x0,
> > > +	crt_DPMS_STANDBY = 0x1,
> > > +	crt_DPMS_SUSPEND = 0x2,
> > > +	crt_DPMS_OFF = 0x3,
> > >  };
> > >  
> > 
> > It seems these are not used.  Just delete them.
> > 
> > regards,
> > dan carpenter
> > 
> The dpms enum is used in the definition of the 
> ddk750_set_dpms function in ddk750_power.h file and
> this function is called in ddk750_display.c on line 158.
> 
> If I were to delete it, what changes should I make to 
> the function mentioned above ? 
> 
> this is my first contribution, thanks for all the help.

Huh.  Using a enum for shifting isn't the right thing.  It should
be unsigned int.

The enum does serve as documentation.  Maybe just change it to
a comment or something next to the ddk750_set_dpms() function.

The ddk750_set_dpms() function does a weird thing:

	value = (value & ~SYSTEM_CTRL_DPMS_MASK) | state;

state is something in 0x3 but SYSTEM_CTRL_DPMS_MASK is
(0x3u << 30).  I bet it should match the on both sides of the
if statement:

	value = (value & ~SYSTEM_CTRL_DPMS_MASK) | (state << 30);

But I can't test it so who knows?

regards,
dan carpenter