Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] sched/topology: Wrappers for sched_domains_mutex

From: Juri Lelli
Date: Fri Mar 07 2025 - 10:18:37 EST


On 07/03/25 10:11, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 3/6/25 9:10 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > Create wrappers for sched_domains_mutex so that it can transparently be
> > used on both CONFIG_SMP and !CONFIG_SMP, as some function will need to
> > do.
> >
> > Reported-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Fixes: 53916d5fd3c0 ("sched/deadline: Check bandwidth overflow earlier for hotplug")
> > Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > v1 -> v2: Remove wrappers for the !SMP case as all users are not defined
> > either in that case
> > ---
> > include/linux/sched.h | 2 ++
> > kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 4 ++--
> > kernel/sched/core.c | 4 ++--
> > kernel/sched/debug.c | 8 ++++----
> > kernel/sched/topology.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> > 5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> > index 9632e3318e0d..d5f8c161d852 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> > @@ -383,6 +383,8 @@ enum uclamp_id {
> > extern struct root_domain def_root_domain;
> > extern struct mutex sched_domains_mutex;
> > #endif
> > +extern void sched_domains_mutex_lock(void);
> > +extern void sched_domains_mutex_unlock(void);
>
> As discussed in the other thread, move the
> sched_domains_mutex_{lock/unlock}{} inside the "#if CONFIG_SMP" block and
> define the else part so that it can be used in code block that will also be
> compiled in the !CONFIG_SMP case.

Ack.

> Other than that, the rest looks good to me.

Thanks! I will be sending out a v3 early next week (waiting a few more
hours in case anyone spots something else that needs rework).

Best,
Juri