Re: [PATCH 05/21] mtd: spinand: Use more specific naming for the erase op

[Miquel Raynal]

On 07/03/2025 at 15:45:03 GMT, Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> If there's no chip erase for SPI NANDs, then keeping the name as it was
> makes more sense to me.

There is no chip erase indeed, but my goal is to mostly clarify the bus
topology here. Specifically the 1s-1s-0 vs. 8d-8d-0 operations.

It is true that this series only uses the data-oriented commands because
that is where the time penalty really is, but I figured renaming all ops
would be nicer to keep the harmony among them and prepare for the next
step (octal dtr).