Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] test_bits: add tests for BIT_U*()

[Vincent Mailhol]

On 08/03/2025 at 01:07, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 07:11:42PM +0900, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
>> On 07/03/2025 at 02:55, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 01:08:15AM +0900, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
>>>> On 06/03/2025 at 22:11, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 08:29:58PM +0900, Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay wrote:
>>>>>> From: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Add some additional tests in lib/test_bits.c to cover the expected
>>>>>> results of the fixed type BIT_U*() macros.
>>>>>
>>>>> Still would be good to have a small assembly test case for GENMASK*() as they
>>>>> went split and it will be a good regression test in case somebody decides to
>>>>> unify both without much thinking..
>>>>
>>>> Let me confirm that I correctly understood your ask. Would something
>>>> like this meet your expectations?
>>>
>>> I believe it should be written in asm.
>>
>> I am not confident enough in my assembly skills to submit asm patches to
>> the kernel. So, I would rather take a pass on that one.
>>
>> Regardless, if somebody decides to unify both without much thinking as
>> you said, I am fully confident that the patch will get Nack-ed right
> 
> As I said above "would be good", if you think it's not feasible by you, perhaps
> a comment (FIXME: ?) in the Kunit test cases that we lack of / need an asm test
> as well.

Ack. I will add a FIXME message in v6.


Yours sincerely,
Vincent Mailhol