Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] selftests: Fix errno checking in syscall_user_dispatch test

[Dmitry Vyukov]

On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 at 17:06, Gregory Price <gourry@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 09:45:26AM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> >       /* len != 0 */
> > -     prctl(PR_SET_SYSCALL_USER_DISPATCH, op, 0x0, 0xff, 0);
> > +     EXPECT_EQ(-1, prctl(PR_SET_SYSCALL_USER_DISPATCH, op, 0x0, 0xff, 0));
> >       EXPECT_EQ(EINVAL, errno);
>
> This patch should probably just be pulled ahead of everything else,
> since you change the behavior of the syscall, and now you're updating
> the test - but it will fail (since this no longer produces EINVAL).
>
> This patch should probably just be entirely separate, maybe even in
> stable?

Should I do something for this (what)? Or maintainers can pull it?
What tree should pull it?