Re: [PATCH v3 09/10] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce XFEATURE_MASK_KERNEL_DYNAMIC xfeature set

[Chao Gao]

On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 10:20:47PM -0700, Chang S. Bae wrote:
>On 3/9/2025 8:49 PM, Chao Gao wrote:
>> 
>> It was suggested by Sean [1].
>...
>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/ZTf5wPKXuHBQk0AN@xxxxxxxxxx/
>
>But, you're defining a kernel "dynamic" feature while introducing a
>"guest-only" xfeature concept. Both seem to be mixed together with this
>patch. Why not call it as a guest-only feature? That's what Sean was
>suggesting, no?

Yes. I agree that we should call it as a guest-only feature. That's also why I
included a note in this patch below the "---" to seek feedback on the naming:

	I am tempted to rename XFEATURE_MASK_KERNEL_DYNAMIC to
	XFEATURE_MASK_GUEST_ONLY. But I am not sure if this was discussed
	and rejected.

Thanks for confirming that the renaming is necessary.