Re: [PATCH] net: usb: lan78xx: Enforce a minimum interrupt polling period
From: Alan Stern
Date: Mon Mar 10 2025 - 14:06:43 EST
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 05:59:31PM +0100, Fiona Klute wrote:
> If a new reset event appears before the previous one has been
> processed, the device can get stuck into a reset loop. This happens
> rarely, but blocks the device when it does, and floods the log with
> messages like the following:
>
> lan78xx 2-3:1.0 enp1s0u3: kevent 4 may have been dropped
>
> The only bit that the driver pays attention to in the interrupt data
> is "link was reset". If there's a flapping status bit in that endpoint
> data (such as if PHY negotiation needs a few tries to get a stable
> link), polling at a slower rate allows the state to settle.
>
> This is a simplified version of a patch that's been in the Raspberry
> Pi downstream kernel since their 4.14 branch, see also:
> https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/2447
>
> Signed-off-by: Fiona Klute <fiona.klute@xxxxxx>
> Cc: kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
> For the stable crew: I've *tested* the patch with 6.12.7 and 6.13.5 on
> a Revolution Pi Connect 4 (Raspberry Pi CM4 based device with built-in
> LAN7800 as second ethernet port), according to the linked issue for
> the RPi downstream kernel the problem should be present in all
> maintained longterm kernel versions, too (based on how long they've
> carried a patch).
>
> drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c b/drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c
> index a91bf9c7e31d..7bf01a31a932 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/usb/lan78xx.c
> @@ -173,6 +173,12 @@
> #define INT_EP_GPIO_1 (1)
> #define INT_EP_GPIO_0 (0)
>
> +/* highspeed device, so polling interval is in microframes (eight per
> + * millisecond)
> + */
> +#define INT_URB_MICROFRAMES_PER_MS 8
> +#define MIN_INT_URB_INTERVAL_MS 8
> +
> static const char lan78xx_gstrings[][ETH_GSTRING_LEN] = {
> "RX FCS Errors",
> "RX Alignment Errors",
> @@ -4527,7 +4533,11 @@ static int lan78xx_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
> if (ret < 0)
> goto out4;
>
> - period = ep_intr->desc.bInterval;
> + period = max(ep_intr->desc.bInterval,
> + MIN_INT_URB_INTERVAL_MS * INT_URB_MICROFRAMES_PER_MS);
This calculation is completely wrong. For high-speed interrupt
endpoints, the bInterval value is encoded using a logarithmic scheme.
The actual interval in microframes is given by 2^(bInterval - 1) (see
Table 9-13 in the USB 2.0 spec). Furthermore, when the value is passed
to usb_fill_int_urb(), the interval argument must be encoded in the same
way (see the kerneldoc for usb_fill_int_urb() in include/linux/usb.h).
The encoded value corresponding to 8 ms is 7, not 64, since 8 ms = 64
uframes and 64 = 2^(7-1).
> + dev_info(&intf->dev,
> + "interrupt urb period set to %d, bInterval is %d\n",
> + period, ep_intr->desc.bInterval);
I doubt that this dev_info() will be very helpful to anyone (in addition
to being wrong since the value in "period" is not the actual period).
Alan Stern