Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n

From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Tue Mar 11 2025 - 09:14:51 EST

Next message: WangYuli: "[PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add include/linux/tpm*.h to TPM maintainers"
Previous message: Will Deacon: "Re: [PATCH v9] arm64: mm: Populate vmemmap at the page level if not section aligned"
In reply to: Borislav Petkov: "Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n"
Next in thread: Oleg Nesterov: "Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 12:21:12PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Yap, that fixes the build:

Lemme run randbuilds with that one, see what else breaks with it.

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Next message: WangYuli: "[PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add include/linux/tpm*.h to TPM maintainers"
Previous message: Will Deacon: "Re: [PATCH v9] arm64: mm: Populate vmemmap at the page level if not section aligned"
In reply to: Borislav Petkov: "Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n"
Next in thread: Oleg Nesterov: "Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]