Re: [PATCH v2] rust/kernel/faux: mark Registration methods inline
From: Ethan Carter Edwards
Date: Tue Mar 11 2025 - 22:16:35 EST
On 25/03/11 08:06AM, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 03:51:38PM -0400, Ethan Carter Edwards wrote:
> > When building the kernel on Arch Linux using on x86_64 with tools:
> > $ rustc --version
> > rustc 1.84.0 (9fc6b4312 2025-01-07)
> > $ cargo --version
> > cargo 1.84.0 (66221abde 2024-11-19)
>
> Is there a reason you didn't drop this from the commit message?
I wasn't sure if the authoritative answer was to drop it. I will not
include it from now on. Thanks.
>
> > $ clang --version
> > clang version 19.1.7
> > Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
> >
> > The following symbols are generated:
> > $ nm vmlinux | rg ' _R' | rustfilt | rg faux
> > ffffffff81959ae0 T <kernel::faux::Registration>::new
> > ffffffff81959b40 T <kernel::faux::Registration as core::ops::drop::Drop>::drop
> >
> > However, these Rust symbols are wrappers around bindings in the C faux
> > code. Inlining these functions removes the middle-man wrapper function
> > After applying this patch, the above function signatures disappear.
> >
> > Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1145
> > Signed-off-by: Ethan Carter Edwards <ethan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> On v1 I replied with:
>
> Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> So you should add that to the commit message when you send a new
> version. :)
My apologies. I forgot to include it, as b4 usually pulls them down for
me and I was just using format-patch and mutt to send v2.
>
> (Unless there are changes that require me to review it again.)
>
> Alice
Thanks for applying the patch, Greg.
Thanks everyone for their help. Rust in the kernel isn't as scary as it
seems! I'll be back to help some more ;).