Re: [PATCH 9/9] mm/madvise: remove !tlb support from madvise_{dontneed,free}_single_vma()

[Lorenzo Stoakes]

On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 02:02:11PM -0700, SeongJae Park wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 14:01:20 +0000 Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 10:23:18AM -0700, SeongJae Park wrote:
> > > madvise_dontneed_single_vma() and madvise_free_single_vma() support both
> > > batched tlb flushes and unbatched tlb flushes use cases depending on
> > > received tlb parameter's value.  The supports were for safe and fine
> > > transition of the usages from the unbatched flushes to the batched ones.
> > > Now the transition is done, and therefore there is no real unbatched tlb
> > > flushes use case.  Remove the code for supporting the no more being used
> > > cases.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Obviously I support this based on previous preview :) but I wonder if we
> > can avoid this horrid caller_tlb pattern in the first instance.
>
> I will try, though I have no good idea for that for now.
>
> Maybe we could simply squash patches 7-9.  I'm bit concerned if it makes
> changes unnecessariy mixed and not small, but I have no strong opinion about
> it.  Please feel free to let me know if you want that.

Yeah, though maybe try to make things as incremental as possible within
that?

>
> >
> > FWIW:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Appreciate your reviews!

No problem! Feel free to propagate to respin (assuming no major changes :)
thanks for writing good clean code!

>
>
> Thanks,
> SJ
>
> [...]