Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] reset: Add USB2PHY control driver for Renesas RZ/V2H(P)

[Philipp Zabel]

Hi Fabrizio,

On Do, 2025-03-13 at 10:14 +0000, Fabrizio Castro wrote:
> Hi Philipp,
> 
> Thanks for your feedback!
> 
> > From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: 13 March 2025 08:37
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] reset: Add USB2PHY control driver for Renesas RZ/V2H(P)
> > 
> > On Mi, 2025-03-05 at 12:39 +0000, Prabhakar wrote:
> > > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > Add support for the USB2PHY control driver on the Renesas RZ/V2H(P) SoC.
> > > Make the driver handle reset and power-down operations for the USB2PHY.
> > > 
> > > Pass OF data to support future SoCs with similar USB2PHY hardware but
> > > different register configurations. Define device-specific initialization
> > > values and control register settings in OF data to ensure flexibility
> > > for upcoming SoCs.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/reset/Kconfig                    |   7 +
> > >  drivers/reset/Makefile                   |   1 +
> > >  drivers/reset/reset-rzv2h-usb2phy-ctrl.c | 223 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  3 files changed, 231 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 drivers/reset/reset-rzv2h-usb2phy-ctrl.c
> > > 
[...]
> > > diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-rzv2h-usb2phy-ctrl.c b/drivers/reset/reset-rzv2h-usb2phy-ctrl.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..a6daeaf37e1c
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-rzv2h-usb2phy-ctrl.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,223 @@
[...]
> > > +static const struct rzv2h_usb2phy_regval rzv2h_init_vals[] = {
> > > +	{ .reg = 0xc10, .val = 0x67c },
> > > +	{ .reg = 0xc14, .val = 0x1f },
> > > +	{ .reg = 0x600, .val = 0x909 },
> > 
> > What are these registers and what are those values doing?
> 
> Unfortunately, there are some licensing restrictions on this IP, this is
> the best that we can do, as per the license agreement.

How am I expected to review this?

For now, I'll assume that these registers are not related to reset
functionality at all, and that this driver should be a phy controller
driver instead of a reset controller driver.

Can you convince me otherwise without breaking license agreements?

regards
Philipp