[PATCH] x86/asm: Use asm_inline() instead of asm() in amd_clear_divider()
From: Uros Bizjak
Date: Thu Mar 13 2025 - 15:18:45 EST
Use asm_inline() to instruct the compiler that the size of asm()
is the minimum size of one instruction, ignoring how many instructions
the compiler thinks it is. ALTERNATIVE macro that expands to several
pseudo directives causes instruction length estimate to count
more than 20 instructions.
bloat-o-meter reports no code size changes.
Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
index 5d2f7e5aff26..06e499ba4fe8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -707,7 +707,7 @@ static inline u32 per_cpu_l2c_id(unsigned int cpu)
*/
static __always_inline void amd_clear_divider(void)
{
- asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE("", "div %2\n\t", X86_BUG_DIV0)
+ asm_inline volatile(ALTERNATIVE("", "div %2", X86_BUG_DIV0)
:: "a" (0), "d" (0), "r" (1));
}
--
2.42.0