Hi,
+start_test "trace livepatched function and check that the live patch remains in effect"trace_funtion() calls cleanup_ftrace() to prepare the test. Ok.
+
+FUNCTION_NAME="livepatch_cmdline_proc_show"
+
+load_lp $MOD_LIVEPATCH
+trace_function "$FUNCTION_NAME"
+if [[ "$(cat /proc/cmdline)" == "$MOD_LIVEPATCH: this has been live patched" ]] ; thenHere, I suppose, cleanup_tracing() is called to clean up after the check
+ log "livepatch: ok"
+fi
+
+check_traced_function "$FUNCTION_NAME"
+
+cleanup_tracing
above so that nothing stays and more tests can be added later. Right?
Would it make sense then to call cleanup_tracing() in
check_traced_function()? I think it would less error prone.
If needed, check_traced_function() can always be upgraded so that it
checks for more traced functions.
Miroslav