Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] rust: use strict provenance APIs

[Tamir Duberstein]

On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 8:59 AM Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 08:41:49AM -0400, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 8:37 AM Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 09:34:42AM +0000, Benno Lossin wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > > The rest Rust code changes look good to me. Although I would suggest you
> > > > > to split this patch into several patches: you can do the conversion from
> > > > > "as" pattern to provenance API one file by one file, and this make it
> > > > > easier for people to review. And after the conversions are done, you can
> > > > > introduce the Makefile changes.
> > > >
> > > > I think it's fine to do several of the `as` conversions in a single
> > >
> > > Well, "fine" != "recommended", right? ;-) If the patch was split,
> > > reviewers would be able to give Reviewed-by to individual patches that
> > > looks fine trivially. Then it's easier to make progress every iteration,
> > > and also allows partially applying the changes. Of course it doesn't
> > > have to be file-by-file.
> >
> > I sent v4 a little while ago, hopefully the resulting complexity is
> > manageable now that the build system is untouched.
> >
>
> I have fun plans today (skiing!), so won't be able to take another
> detailed look. What I was trying to say is that: should you split the
> patches, I would have already given some Reviewed-bys ;-) But as Benno
> said, it's fine, so don't worry, I will take another look later. Thanks!

Have fun! ⛷️