Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree

From: Jiri Slaby
Date: Mon Mar 17 2025 - 04:55:09 EST


On 17. 03. 25, 6:05, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,

On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 15:24:29 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 15:25:16 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 16:25:31 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:

In file included from include/asm-generic/percpu.h:7,
from arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:597,
from arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:6,
from include/linux/preempt.h:79,
from include/linux/spinlock.h:56,
from include/linux/wait.h:9,
from include/linux/wait_bit.h:8,
from include/linux/fs.h:7,
from kernel/events/core.c:11:
kernel/events/core.c: In function 'this_cpc':
include/linux/percpu-defs.h:220:45: error: initialization from pointer to non-enclosed address space
220 | const void __percpu *__vpp_verify = (typeof((ptr) + 0))NULL; \
| ^
include/linux/percpu-defs.h:251:9: note: in expansion of macro '__verify_pcpu_ptr'
251 | __verify_pcpu_ptr(ptr); \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/events/core.c:1222:17: note: in expansion of macro 'this_cpu_ptr'
1222 | return *this_cpu_ptr(pmu->cpu_pmu_context);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~

(and many more similar)

Presumably caused by commit

f67d1ffd841f ("perf/core: Detach 'struct perf_cpu_pmu_context' and 'struct pmu' lifetimes")

I have used the tip tree from next-20250303 for today.

I am still seeing this build failure.

Ditto. Anything happening with this?

I am still using the tip tree from next-20250303.

So am I missing something here? I am still seeing this build failure.

That commit is now

4eabf533fb18 ("perf/core: Detach 'struct perf_cpu_pmu_context' and 'struct pmu' lifetimes")

Is there something in my toolchain? Or some other difference in our
build environments?

FWIW I cannot reproduce with gcc 14 or 9. tip/master builds that file fine for me. Perhaps a merge with some other tree introduces this?

thanks,
--
js
suse labs