Re: [PATCH] net: atm: use sysfs_emit_at() instead of scnprintf()

From: tang.dongxing
Date: Mon Mar 17 2025 - 05:10:19 EST


>On 17/03/2025 08:51, tang.dongxing@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:> From: TangDongxing <tang.dongxing@xxxxxxxxxx>

>> 

>> Follow the advice in Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.rst:

>> show() should only use sysfs_emit() or sysfs_emit_at() when formatting

>> the value to be returned to user space.

>> 

>> Signed-off-by: Tang Dongxing <tang.dongxing@xxxxxxxxxx>Dear ZTE,

>

>Can you slow down? You sent a bunch of emails with similar issues which

>means that dozen of maintainers will deal with the same issues

>independently. This looks like another vivo or huawei style submission,

>leading to bugs sneaked via flood of patches.

>

>First, fix the name used in the SoB (see submitting patches) to match

>Latin transcription.

>

>Second, use proper SoB chain, see submitting patches.

>

>Third, really, really be sure that what you send is correct. You already

>got quite responses, but you still keep sending patches.

>

>Fourth, respond to received feedback instead of flooding us with more of

>this!


Dear Krzysztof,

Thank you for your feedback. I apologize for my previous submissions.

Regarding the issues you've pointed out:

I will correct the name used in the SoB to ensure it matches the Latin transcription as required.

I will double-check my work before sending any further updates.

I appreciate your guidance and will follow the submission guidelines more carefully going forward. If you have any further advice or resources to help me improve my submissions, I would be grateful for your input.

Best regards, 

Tang Dongxing