RE: [PATCH v4 net-next 03/14] net: enetc: move generic MAC filterng interfaces to enetc-core

[Wei Fang]

> title: s/filterng/filtering/
> 
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 01:38:19PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> > Although only ENETC PF can access the MAC address filter table, the table
> > entries can specify MAC address filtering for one or more SIs based on
> > SI_BITMAP, which means that the table also supports MAC address filtering
> > for VFs.
> >
> > Currently, only the ENETC v1 PF driver supports MAC address filtering. In
> > order to add the MAC address filtering support for the ENETC v4 PF driver
> > and VF driver in the future, the relevant generic interfaces are moved to
> > the enetc-core driver. At the same time, the struct enetc_mac_filter is
> > moved from enetc_pf to enetc_si, because enetc_si is a structure shared by
> > PF and VFs. This lays the basis for i.MX95 ENETC PF and VFs to support
> > MAC address filtering.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> 
> For this series I don't see any VF implementation of ndo_set_rx_mode().
> I don't think you have to move struct enetc_mac_filter from struct enetc_pf
> to struct enetc_si, so please don't do that until there is a justification
> for it that is contained in the same patch set, and the two can be
> evaluated together.

Okay, I will keep them in "struct enetc_pf". :)
> 
> Moving enetc_add_mac_addr_ht_filter() and enetc_reset_mac_addr_filter()
> to enetc.c seems fine.