On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 09:05:39AM +0000, John Garry wrote:
That's what I meant.Same here (at least for now until it is changed later).Please note that Christian plans on sending the earlier iomap changes
related to this work for 6.15. Those changes are also in the xfs queue. We
are kinda reverting those changes here, so I think that it would still make
sense for the iomap changes in this series to make 6.15
The xfs changes in this series are unlikely to make 6.15
As such, if we say that ext4 always uses hardware atomics, then we should
mention that xfs does also (until it doesn't).
So, in the end, I'd rather not add those comments at all - ok?If I read through this code it would be kinda nice to figure out why
we're instructing the iomap code to do it. If you look at
xfs_direct_write_iomap_begin it also generally comments on why we
set specific flags.