Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: vmscan: Split proactive reclaim statistics from direct reclaim statistics

[Michal Koutný]

On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 08:03:44PM +0800, Hao Jia <jiahao.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > How silly is it to have multiple memory.reclaim writers?
> > Would it make sense to bind those statistics to each such a write(r)
> > instead of the aggregated totals?
> 
> 
> I'm sorry, I didn't understand what your suggestion was conveying.

For instance one reclaimer for page cache and another for anon (in one
memcg):
  echo "1G swappiness=0" >memory.reclaim &
  echo "1G swappiness=200" >memory.reclaim

> Are you suggesting that the statistics for {pgscan, pgsteal}_{kswapd,
> direct, khugepaged} be merged into one?

Not more merging -- opposite, having separate stats (somewhere) for each
of the above reclaimers.

Michal

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature