Re: [PATCH v3 05/18] nvmet-fcloop: track ref counts for nports

[Daniel Wagner]

On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 12:06:54PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 3/18/25 11:39, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> > A nport object is always used in association with targerport,
> > remoteport, tport and rport objects. Add explicit references for any of
> > the associated object. This ensures that nport is not removed too early
> > on shutdown sequences.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <wagi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   drivers/nvme/target/fcloop.c | 106 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> >   1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/fcloop.c b/drivers/nvme/target/fcloop.c
> > index 245bfe08d91ec81f1979251e8c757a0d46fd09e9..69121a5f0f280936d1b720e9e994d6e5eb9186ff 100644
> > --- a/drivers/nvme/target/fcloop.c
> > +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/fcloop.c
> > @@ -1054,8 +1054,15 @@ static void
> >   fcloop_remoteport_delete(struct nvme_fc_remote_port *remoteport)
> >   {
> >   	struct fcloop_rport *rport = remoteport->private;
> > +	unsigned long flags;
> >   	flush_work(&rport->ls_work);
> > +
> > +	spin_lock_irqsave(&fcloop_lock, flags);
> > +	rport->nport->rport = NULL;
> > +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fcloop_lock, flags);
> > +
> > +	/* nport ref put: rport */
> >   	fcloop_nport_put(rport->nport);
> >   }
> The comment is a bit odd; obviously fcloop_nport_put() puts the nport
> reference for the rport.
> Maybe just remove them?

Sure, I left in it, to figure out which of the get/put pair up. This was
not so clear during the various stages of this series. Now that there is
a rport->nport and tport->nport is left, it's indeed a bit useles.