Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] dt-bindings: hwmon: Add Microchip emc2305 support

From: Guenter Roeck
Date: Tue Mar 18 2025 - 11:22:59 EST


On 3/18/25 01:54, florin.leotescu@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Florin Leotescu <florin.leotescu@xxxxxxx>

Introduce yaml schema for Microchip emc2305 pwm fan controller.

Signed-off-by: Florin Leotescu <florin.leotescu@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx>
---
.../bindings/hwmon/microchip,emc2305.yaml | 113 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 113 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/microchip,emc2305.yaml

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/microchip,emc2305.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/microchip,emc2305.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e61ef97e63af
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/microchip,emc2305.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/hwmon/microchip,emc2305.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Microchip EMC2305 SMBus compliant PWM fan controller
+
+maintainers:
+ - Michael Shych <michaelsh@xxxxxxxxxx>
+
+description:
+ Microchip EMC2301/2/3/5 pwm controller which supports
+ up to five programmable fan control circuits.
+
+properties:
+ compatible:
+ oneOf:
+ - enum:
+ - microchip,emc2305
+ - items:
+ - enum:
+ - microchip,emc2303
+ - microchip,emc2302
+ - microchip,emc2301
+ - const: microchip,emc2305
+
+ reg:
+ maxItems: 1
+
+ '#address-cells':
+ const: 1
+
+ '#size-cells':
+ const: 0
+
+ '#pwm-cells':
+ const: 3
+ description: |
+ Number of cells in a PWM specifier.
+ - cell 0: The PWM frequency
+ - cell 1: The PWM polarity: 0 or PWM_POLARITY_INVERTED
+ - cell 2: The PWM output config:
+ - 0 (Open-Drain)
+ - 1 (Push-Pull)
+
+
+patternProperties:
+ '^fan@[0-4]$':
+ $ref: fan-common.yaml#
+ unevaluatedProperties: false
+ properties:
+ reg:
+ description:
+ The fan number used to determine the associated PWM channel.
+
+ required:
+ - reg
+ - pwms

Is it necessary to make 'pwms' mandatory ? The current code works
just fine with defaults.

Thanks,
Guenter