Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs6490-rb3gen2: Add TC956x PCIe switch node

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 at 18:11, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru
<krishna.chundru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/17/2025 4:57 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 03:03:59PM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote:
> >> Add a node for the TC956x PCIe switch, which has three downstream ports.
> >> Two embedded Ethernet devices are present on one of the downstream ports.
> >>
> >> Power to the TC956x is supplied through two LDO regulators, controlled by
> >> two GPIOs, which are added as fixed regulators. Configure the TC956x
> >> through I2C.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <krishna.chundru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Acked-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs6490-rb3gen2.dts | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi         |   2 +-
> >>   2 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> @@ -735,6 +760,75 @@ &pcie1_phy {
> >>      status = "okay";
> >>   };
> >>
> >> +&pcie1_port {
> >> +    pcie@0,0 {
> >> +            compatible = "pci1179,0623", "pciclass,0604";
> >> +            reg = <0x10000 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0>;
> >> +            #address-cells = <3>;
> >> +            #size-cells = <2>;
> >> +
> >> +            device_type = "pci";
> >> +            ranges;
> >> +            bus-range = <0x2 0xff>;
> >> +
> >> +            vddc-supply = <&vdd_ntn_0p9>;
> >> +            vdd18-supply = <&vdd_ntn_1p8>;
> >> +            vdd09-supply = <&vdd_ntn_0p9>;
> >> +            vddio1-supply = <&vdd_ntn_1p8>;
> >> +            vddio2-supply = <&vdd_ntn_1p8>;
> >> +            vddio18-supply = <&vdd_ntn_1p8>;
> >> +
> >> +            i2c-parent = <&i2c0 0x77>;
> >> +
> >> +            reset-gpios = <&pm8350c_gpios 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> >> +
> >
> > I think I've responded here, but I'm not sure where the message went:
> > please add pinctrl entry for this pin.
> >
> Do we need to also add pinctrl property for this node and refer the
> pinctrl entry for this pin?

I think that is what I've asked for, was that not?

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry