Re: [RFC PATCH] initramfs: Add size validation to prevent tmpfs exhaustion

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 18/03/2025 13:46, Stephen Eta Zhou wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof
> 
>> Just in case before anyone tries to actually apply it: the entire patch
>> has both corrupted header and actual patch is corrupted - all
>> indentation messed.
> 
> Sorry, this is my oversight.....
> I checked it locally using checkpatch.pl and it was fine, but I just used it to import and found that there is a problem. Sorry for wasting your time. I will regenerate this patch and resend it in the correct format.
> 
> Krzysztof, thanks for pointing this out.
> 
> Thanks,
> Stephen
> ________________________________________
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2025 19:55
> To: David Disseldorp <ddiss@xxxxxxx>; Stephen Eta Zhou <stephen.eta.zhou@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: jsperbeck@xxxxxxxxxx <jsperbeck@xxxxxxxxxx>; akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; lukas@xxxxxxxxx <lukas@xxxxxxxxx>; wufan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <wufan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] initramfs: Add size validation to prevent tmpfs exhaustion
>  
What is this header doing this? Use standard mailing list response
style, not some copy-paste and then quote entire irrelevant context.

Best regards,
Krzysztof