Re: [PATCH v7 8/8] [DO NOT MERGE] x86/kexec: Add CFI type information to relocate_kernel()
From: Josh Poimboeuf
Date: Tue Mar 18 2025 - 18:41:51 EST
On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 09:06:58PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-03-18 at 10:14 -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 03:56:36PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > > For the relocate_kernel() case I don't think we care much about the
> > > first. Without a CFI prologue, no *other* code can be tricked into
> > > calling relocate_kernel()
> >
> > But for FineIBT the hash is checked on the callee side. So it loses
> > FineIBT protection.
>
> Right now the relocate_kernel() code doesn't even have an endbr, does
> it? So it isn't a useful gadget?
In that case wouldn't IBT explode when you indirect call it? Or is IBT
getting disabled beforehand?
> > > — and besides, it's in the kernel's data
> > > section and isn't executable anyway until the kexec code copies it to a
> > > page that *is*.
> >
> > Does the code get copied immediately before getting called, or can it be
> > initialized earlier during boot when kdump does its initial setup?
>
> It's initialized earlier, in machine_kexec_prepare(), and then the page
> is set ROX.
If that happens during boot (like for kdump init) then it'll be in text
the whole time after boot, right?
--
Josh