[PATCH v2 22/57] irqdomain: mailbox: Switch to irq_domain_create_tree()

[Jiri Slaby (SUSE)]

irq_domain_add_tree() is going away as being obsolete now. Switch to
the preferred irq_domain_create_tree(). That differs in the first
parameter: It takes more generic struct fwnode_handle instead of struct
device_node. Therefore, of_fwnode_handle() is added around the
parameter.

Note some of the users can likely use dev->fwnode directly instead of
indirect of_fwnode_handle(dev->of_node). But dev->fwnode is not
guaranteed to be set for all, so this has to be investigated on case to
case basis (by people who can actually test with the HW).

Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby (SUSE) <jirislaby@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
 drivers/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.c b/drivers/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.c
index 0b17a38ea6bf..ea44ffb5ce1a 100644
--- a/drivers/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.c
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.c
@@ -312,8 +312,8 @@ static int qcom_ipcc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (!name)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	ipcc->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_tree(pdev->dev.of_node,
-					       &qcom_ipcc_irq_ops, ipcc);
+	ipcc->irq_domain = irq_domain_create_tree(of_fwnode_handle(pdev->dev.of_node),
+						  &qcom_ipcc_irq_ops, ipcc);
 	if (!ipcc->irq_domain)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-- 
2.49.0