Re: [PATCH] fs: load the ->i_sb pointer once in inode_sb_list_{add,del}
From: Matthew Wilcox
Date: Wed Mar 19 2025 - 12:18:07 EST
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 05:11:25PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 19-03-25 01:46:35, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > While this may sound like a pedantic clean up, it does in fact impact
> > code generation -- the patched add routine is slightly smaller.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> I'm surprised it matters for the compiler but as Christian wrote, why not.
> Feel free to add:
I suspect it's because there's a spin_lock() involved. The barriers
we have probably mean we've told the compiler that it can't cache the
value loaded before the spin_lock().