On 3/19/2025 12:56 AM, Peter Wang (王信友) wrote:
Could use atomic_t for counter protect?
Are you suggesting to convert the dev_lvl_exception_count type from u32 to atomic_t type? Because the value of dev_lvl_exception_count is returned to the user space via the device_lvl_exception_count_show() using the sysfs_emit() function, keeping the dev_lvl_exception_count as u32 data type probably works better in terms of the format.