Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/3] bpf, sockmap: avoid using sk_socket after free when sending
From: Jiayuan Chen
Date: Wed Mar 19 2025 - 20:27:43 EST
March 20, 2025 at 08:06, "Cong Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 11:36:13PM +0000, Jiayuan Chen wrote:
>
> >
> > 2025/3/20 07:02, "Cong Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 05:22:54PM +0800, Jiayuan Chen wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > The sk->sk_socket is not locked or referenced, and during the call to
> >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hm? We should have a reference in socket map, whether directly or
> >
> >
> >
> > indirectly, right? When we add a socket to a socket map, we do call
> >
> >
> >
> > sock_map_psock_get_checked() to obtain a reference.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yes, but we remove psock from sockmap when sock_map_close() was called
> >
> > '''
> >
> > sock_map_close
> >
> > lock_sock(sk);
> >
> > rcu_read_lock();
> >
> > psock = sk_psock(sk);
> >
> > // here we remove psock and the reference of psock become 0
> >
> > sock_map_remove_links(sk, psock)
> >
>
> sk_psock_drop() also calls cancel_delayed_work_sync(&psock->work),
>
> althrough in yet another work. Is this also a contribution to this bug?
>
Maybe it's related. Calling cancel_delayed_work_sync() in sk_psock_drop()
is too late for our scenario.
To be more precise, the core goal of this patch is to prevent sock_map_close()
from executing until the backlog work completes. This is because sock_map_close()
resides in the close(fd) path, once it finishes, subsequent steps will release
the sk_socket. Therefore, performing cancellation in sk_psock_drop() is too late.
Upon reviewing historical commits, I found that the backlog work originally held
lock_sk, which naturally synchronized with lock_sk in sock_map_close. However,
when the backlog work later removed lock_sk, an alternative synchronization
mechanism(just hold psock reference like this patch) became necessary.
> >
> > psock = sk_psock_get(sk);
> >
> > if (unlikely(!psock))
> >
> > goto no_psock; <=== jmp to no_psock
> >
> > rcu_read_unlock();
> >
> > release_sock(sk);
> >
> > cancel_delayed_work_sync(&psock->work); <== no chance to run cancel
> >
> > '''
> >
>
> I have to say sock_map_close() becomes harder and harder to understand
>
> now. And I am feeling we may have more bugs since we have two flying
>
> work's here: psock->rwork and psock->work.
>
> Thanks.
Yes, this patch prevent sock_map_close() from executing
until the backlog work completes. This likely makes the
cancel_delayed_work in sk_psock_destroy redundant.
The code has undergone too many iterations. While sk_psock_destroy certainly
contains redundant operations, we should retain it for now. There may be
hidden dependencies we haven't fully untangled.
Thanks.