Re: [PATCH v2 56/57] docs: irqdomain: Update

[Jiri Slaby]

On 19. 03. 25, 19:01, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > @@ -15,45 +15,64 @@ such as GPIO controllers avoid reimplementing identical callback
> >   mechanisms as the IRQ core system by modelling their interrupt
> >   handlers as irqchips. I.e. in effect cascading interrupt controllers.
> >   
> > -Here the interrupt number loose all kind of correspondence to
> > -hardware interrupt numbers: whereas in the past, IRQ numbers could
> > -be chosen so they matched the hardware IRQ line into the root
> > -interrupt controller (i.e. the component actually fireing the
> > -interrupt line to the CPU) nowadays this number is just a number.
> > +So in the past, IRQ numbers could be chosen so that they match the
> > +hardware IRQ line into the root interrupt controller (i.e. the
> > +component actually firing the interrupt line to the CPU). Nowadays,
> > +this number is just a number and the number loose all kind of
>
>                                                 loses

Thanks, fixed in 55/57 where I explicitly do "3rd person -> add 's' to 
verbs.". Even though this was "loose" and not "lose" ;).

--
js
suse labs