Re: WARNING in cm109_urb_irq_callback/usb_submit_urb

[Alan Stern]

On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 02:35:23PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> 
> 
> On 20.03.25 05:39, 白烁冉 wrote:
> > Dear Maintainers,
> > 
> > When using our customized Syzkaller to fuzz the latest Linux kernel, the following crash (94th)was triggered.
> > 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> is there a way to use the syzkaller for testing a patch?
> 
> 	Regards
> 		Oliver

> From 03d78ca8c47c8c888df7c7ae2c7109825799d236 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@xxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 14:29:17 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] USB: cm109: fix race between restarting and close
> 
> cm109_input_close() can race with cm109_restore_state()
> Hence cm109_submit_buzz_toggle() needs to check
> the shutdown flag
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/input/misc/cm109.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/cm109.c b/drivers/input/misc/cm109.c
> index 0cfe5d4a573c..8ae62b5e45f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/misc/cm109.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/cm109.c
> @@ -348,6 +348,8 @@ static void cm109_submit_buzz_toggle(struct cm109_dev *dev)
>  	else
>  		dev->ctl_data->byte[HID_OR0] &= ~BUZZER_ON;
>  
> +	if (dev->shutdown)
> +		return;

This test must itself be subject to the same race, right?  There needs 
to be some kind of synchronization between the two tasks (i.e., a mutex, 
spinlock, or something similar).

Alan Stern

>  	error = usb_submit_urb(dev->urb_ctl, GFP_ATOMIC);
>  	if (error)
>  		dev_err(&dev->intf->dev,
> -- 
> 2.48.1