Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] i2c: Introduce i2c bus extensions

[Wolfram Sang]

> The i2c-parent was proposed by Rob [0]. The need for the double link
> is what you, Hervé and I had agreed during our discussion after LPC,
> based on having realized that the forward link is insufficient for some
> cases (see "Second case" in the cover letter).

Ah, we talked *after* LPC. Sorry, I remembered it wrong and thought we
talked before it. Will check the patches.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature