Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: agilex: Update eccmgr in DTSI to reflect hw/yaml

From: Gerlach, Matthew
Date: Thu Mar 20 2025 - 19:24:49 EST



On 3/20/2025 12:34 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 09:46:21AM -0700, Matthew Gerlach wrote:
> Update socfpga_agilex.dtsi to track the actual hardware description
> provided in altr,socfpga-s10-ecc-manager.yaml.
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex.dtsi | 18 ++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex.dtsi
> index 1235ba5a9865..708cb8e762b6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex.dtsi
> @@ -602,8 +602,7 @@ sdr: sdr@f8011100 {
> };
> > eccmgr {
> - compatible = "altr,socfpga-s10-ecc-manager",
> - "altr,socfpga-a10-ecc-manager";
> + compatible = "altr,socfpga-s10-ecc-manager";

You are breaking the ABI here. Before this series, the driver required
altr,socfpga-a10-ecc-manager.
Yes, breaking the ABI required the change in PATCH 2/4, which is suboptimal.

> altr,sysmgr-syscon = <&sysmgr>;
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <1>;
> @@ -619,40 +618,35 @@ sdramedac {
> };
> > ocram-ecc@ff8cc000 {
> - compatible = "altr,socfpga-s10-ocram-ecc",
> - "altr,socfpga-a10-ocram-ecc";
> + compatible = "altr,socfpga-a10-ocram-ecc";

AIUI, nothing used altr,socfpga-s10-ocram-ecc, so this change is okay I
guess. Normally, we'd require both because there might be some
difference you find later on, but here you could just look at the parent
node compatible.

If it were me, I'd just add the compatible string in the schema and
avoid the .dts change. That would have been less work...
Less work sounds better. I will look at just creating the yaml, with no dtsi/dts and no driver changes.

Rob


Thanks for the feedback,

Matthew Gerlach