Re: [RFC Patch v1 0/3] Fix using wrong GPF DVSEC location issue

From: Davidlohr Bueso
Date: Thu Mar 20 2025 - 22:34:39 EST

Next message: Howard Chu: "Re: [PATCH v2] perf trace: Implement syscall summary in BPF"
Previous message: Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan): "Re: [PATCH] HID: quirks: Add quirk for another Chicony Electronics HP 5MP Camera"
In reply to: Jonathan Cameron: "Re: [RFC Patch v1 3/3] cxl/pci: Drop the parameter is_port of cxl_gpf_get_dvsec()"
Next in thread: Davidlohr Bueso: "Re: [RFC Patch v1 0/3] Fix using wrong GPF DVSEC location issue"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 19 Mar 2025, Li Ming wrote:

But I am not sure if all dports under a same port will have same
configuration space layout, if yes, that will not be a problem. If I am
wrong, please let me know, thanks.

Yes, when caching the dvsec was suggested, it was my assumption that the
config space would be the same.

Thanks,
Davidlohr

Next message: Howard Chu: "Re: [PATCH v2] perf trace: Implement syscall summary in BPF"
Previous message: Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan): "Re: [PATCH] HID: quirks: Add quirk for another Chicony Electronics HP 5MP Camera"
In reply to: Jonathan Cameron: "Re: [RFC Patch v1 3/3] cxl/pci: Drop the parameter is_port of cxl_gpf_get_dvsec()"
Next in thread: Davidlohr Bueso: "Re: [RFC Patch v1 0/3] Fix using wrong GPF DVSEC location issue"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]