>On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 05:09:02PM +0800, tang.dongxing@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> >On 17/03/2025 08:51, tang.dongxing@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:> From: TangDongxing <tang.dongxing@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >>
>> >> Follow the advice in Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.rst:
>> >> show() should only use sysfs_emit() or sysfs_emit_at() when formatting
>> >> the value to be returned to user space.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Tang Dongxing <tang.dongxing@xxxxxxxxxx>Dear ZTE,
>> >
>> >Can you slow down? You sent a bunch of emails with similar issues which
>> >means that dozen of maintainers will deal with the same issues
>> >independently. This looks like another vivo or huawei style submission,
>> >leading to bugs sneaked via flood of patches.
>> >
>> >First, fix the name used in the SoB (see submitting patches) to match
>> >Latin transcription.
>> >
>> >Second, use proper SoB chain, see submitting patches.
>> >
>> >Third, really, really be sure that what you send is correct. You already
>> >got quite responses, but you still keep sending patches.
>> >
>> >Fourth, respond to received feedback instead of flooding us with more of
>> >this!
>>
>> Dear Krzysztof,
>> Thank you for your feedback. I apologize for my previous submissions.
>> Regarding the issues you've pointed out:
>> I will correct the name used in the SoB to ensure it matches the Latin transcription as required.
>> I will double-check my work before sending any further updates.
>> I appreciate your guidance and will follow the submission guidelines more carefully going forward. If you have any further advice or resources to help me improve my submissions, I would be grateful for your input.
>> Best regards,
>> Tang Dongxing
>
>Thanks Tang Dongxing,
>
>Further to Krzystof's comments: please coordinate with your colleague
>Xie Ludan who has also posted a patch in this area.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250317152933756kWrF1Y_e-2EKtrR_GGegq@xxxxxxxxxx/
>
>It will be much easier for review if there is a single patch
>that addresses these issues for ATM.
>
>Also, please consider reading the following guidance on processes
>for the networking subsystem of the Linux kernel. These are similar
>but different to other subsystems.
>
> https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-netdev.html
Dear SimonHroman,
Thank you for your guidance. I have contacted Xie Ludan,
we recommend that the community review be based on the https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250317152933756kWrF1Y_e-2EKtrR_GGegq@xxxxxxxxxx/
I will carefully read the the networking subsystem guidance before sending any further updates.
Best regard,
Tang Dongxing