Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] mm: migrate: Allow misplaced migration without VMA too
From: Balbir Singh
Date: Sun Mar 23 2025 - 22:56:08 EST
On 3/6/25 16:45, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> migrate_misplaced_folio_prepare() can be called from a
> context where VMA isn't available. Allow the migration
> to work from such contexts too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/migrate.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
> index fb19a18892c8..5b21856a0dd0 100644
> --- a/mm/migrate.c
> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> @@ -2639,7 +2639,8 @@ static struct folio *alloc_misplaced_dst_folio(struct folio *src,
>
> /*
> * Prepare for calling migrate_misplaced_folio() by isolating the folio if
> - * permitted. Must be called with the PTL still held.
> + * permitted. Must be called with the PTL still held if called with a non-NULL
> + * vma.
> */
> int migrate_misplaced_folio_prepare(struct folio *folio,
> struct vm_area_struct *vma, int node)
> @@ -2656,7 +2657,7 @@ int migrate_misplaced_folio_prepare(struct folio *folio,
> * See folio_likely_mapped_shared() on possible imprecision
> * when we cannot easily detect if a folio is shared.
> */
> - if ((vma->vm_flags & VM_EXEC) &&
> + if (vma && (vma->vm_flags & VM_EXEC) &&
> folio_likely_mapped_shared(folio))
> return -EACCES;
>
In the worst case, the absence of the vma would mean that we try to isolate
and migrate a shared folio with executable pages. Are those a key target for the
hot page migration?
Balbir