Re: [PATCH] mISDN: hfcsusb: Optimize performance by replacing rw_lock with spinlock

[Simon Horman]

On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 01:20:24AM +0800, Yu-Chun Lin wrote:
> The 'HFClock', an rwlock, is only used by writers, making it functionally
> equivalent to a spinlock.
> 
> According to Documentation/locking/spinlocks.rst:
> 
> "Reader-writer locks require more atomic memory operations than simple
> spinlocks. Unless the reader critical section is long, you are better
> off just using spinlocks."
> 
> Since read_lock() is never called, switching to a spinlock reduces
> overhead and improves efficiency.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yu-Chun Lin <eleanor15x@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Build tested only, as I don't have the hardware. 
> Ensured all rw_lock -> spinlock conversions are complete, and replacing
> rw_lock with spinlock should always be safe.
> 
>  drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcsusb.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Hi Yu-Chun Lin,

Thanks for your patch.

Unfortunately I think it would be best to leave this rather old
and probably little used driver as-is in this regard unless there
is a demonstrable improvement on real hardware.

Otherwise the small risk of regression and overhead of driver
changes seems to outweigh the theoretical benefit.

-- 
pw-bot: deferred