On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 08:30:43AM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote:Hi Rob,
Move the phy, phy-names, wake-gpio's to the pcie root port node instead of
the bridge node, as agreed upon in multiple places one instance is[1].
You aren't really moving them except in the example. This is an ABI
break for sc7280. Is anyone going to care?
You need to deprecate the properties in the old location.
ackUpdate the qcom,pcie-common.yaml to include the phy, phy-names, and
wake-gpios properties in the root port node. There is already reset-gpio
defined for PERST# in pci-bus-common.yaml, start using that property
instead of perst-gpio.
For backward compatibility, do not remove any existing properties in the
bridge node.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20241211192014.GA3302752@bhelgaas/
Signed-off-by: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <krishna.chundru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie-common.yaml | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
.../devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie-sc7280.yaml | 18 ++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie-common.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie-common.yaml
index 0480c58f7d99..258c21c01c72 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie-common.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie-common.yaml
@@ -85,6 +85,28 @@ properties:
opp-table:
type: object
+patternProperties:
+ "^pcie@":
+ type: object
+ $ref: /schemas/pci/pci-pci-bridge.yaml#
+
+ properties:
+ reg:
+ maxItems: 1
+
+ phys:
+ maxItems: 1
+
+ phy-names:
+ items:
+ - const: pciephy
Just drop phy-names in the new location. It's pointless especially when
foo-names is just "${module}foo".
+
+ wake-gpios:
+ description: GPIO controlled connection to WAKE# signal
+ maxItems: 1
+
+ unevaluatedProperties: false
+
required:
- reg
- reg-names