Re: [PATCH v2 04/14] dt-bindings: mfd: bd96802: Add ROHM BD96806
From: Conor Dooley
Date: Tue Mar 25 2025 - 13:14:57 EST
On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 10:55:21AM +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> The ROHM BD96806 is very similar to the BD96802. The differences visible
> to the drivers is different tune voltage ranges.
>
> Add compatible for the ROHM BD96805 PMIC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
> Revision history:
> v1 => :
> - No changes
> ---
> .../bindings/mfd/rohm,bd96802-pmic.yaml | 19 ++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd96802-pmic.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd96802-pmic.yaml
> index d5d9e69dc0c2..c6e6be4015b2 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd96802-pmic.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd96802-pmic.yaml
> @@ -4,23 +4,23 @@
> $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mfd/rohm,bd96802-pmic.yaml#
> $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>
> -title: ROHM BD96802 Scalable Power Management Integrated Circuit
> +title: ROHM BD96802 / BD96806Scalable Power Management Integrated Circuit
^ Missing space here :)
>
> maintainers:
> - Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> description: |
> - BD96802Qxx-C is an automotive grade configurable Power Management
> - Integrated Circuit supporting Functional Safety features for application
> + BD96802Qxx-C and BD96806 are automotive grade configurable Power Management
> + Integrated Circuits supporting Functional Safety features for application
> processors, SoCs and FPGAs
>
> properties:
> compatible:
> - const: rohm,bd96802
> + enum:
> + - rohm,bd96802
> + - rohm,bd96806
>
> reg:
> - description:
> - I2C slave address.
I'd just drop this from the original.
> maxItems: 1
>
> interrupts:
> @@ -29,7 +29,8 @@ properties:
> for fatal IRQs which will cause the PMIC to shut down power outputs.
> In many systems this will shut down the SoC contolling the PMIC and
> connecting/handling the errb can be omitted. However, there are cases
> - where the SoC is not powered by the PMIC. In that case it may be
> + where the SoC is not powered by the PMIC or has a short time backup
> + energy to handle shutdown of critical hardware. In that case it may be
> useful to connect the errb and handle errb events.
> minItems: 1
> maxItems: 2
> @@ -69,7 +70,7 @@ examples:
> interrupt-names = "intb", "errb";
>
> regulators {
> - buck1: BUCK1 {
> + buck1 {
Here too?
> regulator-name = "buck1";
> regulator-ramp-delay = <1250>;
> /* 0.5V min INITIAL - 150 mV tune */
> @@ -84,7 +85,7 @@ examples:
> regulator-temp-protection-kelvin = <1>;
> regulator-temp-warn-kelvin = <0>;
> };
> - buck2: BUCK2 {
and here?
> + buck2 {
> regulator-name = "buck2";
> regulator-min-microvolt = <350000>;
> regulator-max-microvolt = <3450000>;
> --
> 2.49.0
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature