On Tue, 25 Mar 2025, Denis Arefev wrote:Apparently, the developer realized that the output is very noisy and
The value returned by the acpi_evaluate_integer() function is notShouldn't you handle the error from acpi_evaluate_integer() properly
checked, but the result is not always successful, so an uninitialized
'val' variable may be used in calculations.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Fixes: b23910c2194e ("asus-laptop: Pegatron Lucid accelerometer")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Denis Arefev <arefev@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c
index d460dd194f19..b74b7d0eb6c2 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-laptop.c
@@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ static int asus_pega_lucid_set(struct asus_laptop *asus, int unit, bool enable)
static int pega_acc_axis(struct asus_laptop *asus, int curr, char *method)
{
int i, delta;
- unsigned long long val;
+ unsigned long long val = PEGA_ACC_CLAMP;
for (i = 0; i < PEGA_ACC_RETRIES; i++) {
acpi_evaluate_integer(asus->handle, method, NULL, &val);
instead?