Re: [PATCH v2] tty: serial: uartlite: register uart driver in init
From: Greg KH
Date: Wed Mar 26 2025 - 10:03:47 EST
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 11:04:57AM +0100, Elodie Decerle wrote:
> From: Jakub Lewalski <jakub.lewalski@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> When two instances of uart devices are probing, a concurrency race can
> occur. If one thread calls uart_register_driver function, which first
> allocates and assigns memory to 'uart_state' member of uart_driver
> structure, the other instance can bypass uart driver registration and
> call ulite_assign. This calls uart_add_one_port, which expects the uart
> driver to be fully initialized. This leads to a kernel panic due to a
> null pointer dereference:
>
> [ 8.143581] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000002b8
> [ 8.156982] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode
> [ 8.156984] #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page
> [ 8.156986] PGD 0 P4D 0
> ...
> [ 8.180668] RIP: 0010:mutex_lock+0x19/0x30
> [ 8.188624] Call Trace:
> [ 8.188629] ? __die_body.cold+0x1a/0x1f
> [ 8.195260] ? page_fault_oops+0x15c/0x290
> [ 8.209183] ? __irq_resolve_mapping+0x47/0x80
> [ 8.209187] ? exc_page_fault+0x64/0x140
> [ 8.209190] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30
> [ 8.209196] ? mutex_lock+0x19/0x30
> [ 8.223116] uart_add_one_port+0x60/0x440
> [ 8.223122] ? proc_tty_register_driver+0x43/0x50
> [ 8.223126] ? tty_register_driver+0x1ca/0x1e0
> [ 8.246250] ulite_probe+0x357/0x4b0 [uartlite]
>
> To prevent it, move uart driver registration in to init function. This
> will ensure that uart_driver is always registered when probe function
> is called.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Lewalski <jakub.lewalski@xxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Elodie Decerle <elodie.decerle@xxxxxxxxx>
If you forward on a patch from someone else, you also have to sign off
on it. Please read our documentation for what this means.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Remove mutex lock in uart_register_driver
> - Move uart driver registration to init function (Greg's feedback)
The changes stuff goes below the:
> ---
line.
Again, our documentation should explain this.
thanks,
greg k-h