Re: [RFC PATCH v2 02/13] ima: always create runtime_measurements sysfs file for ima_hash
From: Mimi Zohar
Date: Wed Mar 26 2025 - 10:54:14 EST
On Wed, 2025-03-26 at 14:46 +0100, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > On Wed, 2025-03-26 at 09:21 +0100, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> > > Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > >
> > > > On Sun, 2025-03-23 at 15:09 +0100, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>
> > > > "ima_hash" is the default file hash algorithm. Re-using it as the default
> > > > complete measurement list assumes that the subsequent kexec'ed kernels configure
> > > > and define it as the default file hash algorithm as well, which might not be the
> > > > case.
> > >
> > > I don't really see why the ima_hashes would have to match between kexecs
> > > for this to work -- all events' template hashes are getting recreated
> > > from scratch anyway after kexec (ima_restore_measurement_list() ->
> > > ima_calc_field_array_hash()).
> > >
> > > That is, if ima_hash=sha256 first, and ima_hash=sha384 after kexec, one
> > > would have *runtime_measurements_sha256 first and
> > > *runtime_measurements_sha384 after kexec. And both had exclusively
> > > template hashes of their respective algo in them each.
> > >
> > > What am I missing?
> >
> > Your solution would work nicely, if the "ima_hash" algorithm could be guaranteed
> > to be built into the kernel. It's highly unlikely someone would choose a hash
> > algorithm not built into kernel, but it is possible. hash_setup() only verifies
> > that the hash algorithm is a valid name.
>
> But ima_init_ima_crypto(), hence the whole IMA __init, would fail if
> ima_hash was unavailable at __init time?
Thanks for pointing that out! Now I understand why just selecting SHA256 is
sufficient.
Mimi
>
> > Either fix hash_setup() to guarantee that the chosen hash algorithm is built
> > into the kernel or use the CONFIG_IMA_DEFAULT_HASH and add a Kconfig to select
> > the hash algorithm. This would be in lieu of v2 05/13.
> >
> > > > Drop this patch.
> > >
> > > Fine by me, but just to confirm, in case there's no TPM attached and
> > > SHA1 was disabled, there would be no /sys/*/*runtime_measurement* at all
> > > then. Is that Ok?
> >
> > Of course not. :)
> >
> > > ima_hash was chosen here only, because after this series, it will be the
> > > only single algorithm guaranteed to be available.
> >
> > With the proposed changes to "[RFC PATCH v2 05/13] ima: select CRYPTO_SHA256
> > from Kconfig', SHA256 would be added to the "extra" measurements if the TPM
> > SHA256 bank is disabled.
>
>