Re: [PATCH] cxl/acpi: Verify CHBS length for CXL2.0
From: Ira Weiny
Date: Wed Mar 26 2025 - 23:44:47 EST
Li Zhijian wrote:
> Per CXL Spec r3.1 Table 9-21, both CXL1.1 and CXL2.0 have defined their
> own length, verify it to avoid an invalid CHBS
I think this looks fine. But did a platform have issues with this? Does
this need to be backported?
Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx>
[snip]