Re: [PATCH v11 1/3] dt-bindings: pwm: Add binding for Allwinner D1/T113-S3/R329 PWM controller

[Uwe Kleine-König]

Hello,

On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 12:40:12PM +0300, Aleksandr Shubin wrote:
> Allwinner's D1, T113-S3 and R329 SoCs have a new pwm
> controller witch is different from the previous pwm-sun4i.
> 
> The D1 and T113 are identical in terms of peripherals,
> they differ only in the architecture of the CPU core, and
> even share the majority of their DT. Because of that,
> using the same compatible makes sense.
> The R329 is a different SoC though, and should have
> a different compatible string added, especially as there
> is a difference in the number of channels.
> 
> D1 and T113s SoCs have one PWM controller with 8 channels.
> R329 SoC has two PWM controllers in both power domains, one of
> them has 9 channels (CPUX one) and the other has 6 (CPUS one).
> 
> Add a device tree binding for them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aleksandr Shubin <privatesub2@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

nitpick: Put your S-o-b last.

> +  allwinner,npwms:
> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> +    description: The number of PWM channels configured for this instance
> +    enum: [6, 9]

Maybe mention the default that is assumed if this property isn't
provided? Reading the commit log makes me wonder if the default is 8. If
so I suggest to also allow that value explicitly.

Best regards
Uwe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature