Re: [RFC v2 13/17] x86/apic: Handle EOI writes for SAVIC guests

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Fri, Mar 21 2025 at 10:11, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2025, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> 
>> Congrats. You managed to re-implement find_last_bit() in the most
>> incomprehesible way.
>
> Heh, having burned myself quite badly by trying to use find_last_bit() to get
> pending/in-service IRQs in KVM code...
>
> Using find_last_bit() doesn't work because the ISR chunks aren't contiguous,
> they're 4-byte registers at 16-byte strides.

Which is obvious to solve with trivial integer math:

      bit = vector + 32 * (vector / 32);

ergo

     vector = bit - 16 * (bit / 32);

No?

> That said, copy+pasting the aforementioned KVM code is absurd.  Please extract
> KVM's find_highest_vector() to common code.

No. Reimplement this with find_last_bit() and the trivial adjustment
above and remove find_highest_vector() as there is no point to
proliferate a bad reimplementation of find_last_bit().

Thanks,

        tglx