On 27/03/2025 07:09, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 26/03/2025 18:34, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
You can combine the series or add here a dependency.
I meant bindings are exactly the same, unless I missed something.
Devices are similar enough as well.
Seems simpler to me to have two separate files ?
Not really, more files to maintain, more trivialities to fix if we
decide to change something in all bindings (e.g. style).
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Hmm, so we have two in-flight series and one yaml file.
OK, I'll drop this patch and add ov02c10 to the ov02e10 yaml as you suggest.
So long as the yaml file goes in first, the order of application of the
ov02c10/ov02e10 drivers won't matter and can be fixed with a cherry- pick.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
So just in terms of sequencing, are you happy for us to merge ovo2c10 and then do ov02e10 ?
Since I have a bunch of driver work to do on ov02e10 I think this would make sense.
---
bod