Re: linux-next regression: SNP Guest boot hangs with certain cpu/mem config combination

[Kirill A. Shutemov]

On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 10:33:31AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Can you quantify the speedup?

Test is below. I run it 10 times on a VM without unaccepted memory. With
and without has_unaccepted_memory() check in cond_accept_memory().

The difference is not huge, but it is there:

Without static branch:	Mean: 35559993 us, StdDev: 167264
With static branch:	Mean: 35286227 us, StdDev: 207595
Diff:			-273766 us / -0.77%

static int __init alloc_test(void)
{
	ktime_t start_time, end_time;
	s64 delta, total = 0;
	struct page *page;
	int i, j;

	for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
		start_time = ktime_get();
		for (j = 0; j < 100000; j++) {
			page = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL, PMD_ORDER);
			__free_pages(page, PMD_ORDER);
		}
		end_time = ktime_get();
		printk("%d: %lld us\n", i, ktime_us_delta(end_time, start_time));
	}

	for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
		start_time = ktime_get();
		for (j = 0; j < 100000; j++) {
			page = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL, PMD_ORDER);
			__free_pages(page, PMD_ORDER);
		}
		end_time = ktime_get();
		delta = ktime_us_delta(end_time, start_time);
		total += delta;
		printk("%d: %lld us\n", i, delta);
	}

	printk("total: %lld us\n", total);

	return 0;
}
late_initcall(alloc_test);
-- 
  Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov