On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 9:13 PM Abdiel Janulgue
<abdiel.janulgue@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
As suggested by Andreas Hindborg, we could do better here by
having the macros return `Result`, so that we don't have to wrap
these calls in a closure for validation which is confusing.
Signed-off-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@xxxxxxxxx>
I would suggest:
Suggested-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/87h63qhz4q.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx/
Maybe also consider if Co-developed-by etc. makes sense since he
provided the diff.