Re: [PATCH v7 00/17] Provide a new two step DMA mapping API

[Marek Szyprowski]

On 22.03.2025 01:41, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 12:52:30AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>> Christoph's vision was to make a performance DMA API path that could
>>> be used to implement any scatterlist-like data structure very
>>> efficiently without having to teach the DMA API about all sorts of
>>> scatterlist-like things.
>> Thanks for explaining one more motivation behind this patchset!
> Sure, no problem.
>
> To close the loop on the bigger picture here..
>
> When you put the parts together:
>
>   1) dma_map_sg is the only API that is both performant and fully
>      functional
>
>   2) scatterlist is a horrible leaky design and badly misued all over
>      the place. When Logan added SG_DMA_BUS_ADDRESS it became quite
>      clear that any significant changes to scatterlist are infeasible,
>      or at least we'd break a huge number of untestable legacy drivers
>      in the process.
>
>   3) We really want to do full featured performance DMA *without* a
>      struct page. This requires changing scatterlist, inventing a new
>      scatterlist v2 and DMA map for it, or this idea here of a flexible
>      lower level DMA API entry point.
>
>      Matthew has been talking about struct-pageless for a long time now
>      from the block/mm direction using folio & memdesc and this is
>      meeting his work from the other end of the stack by starting to
>      build a way to do DMA on future struct pageless things. This is
>      going to be huge multi-year project but small parts like this need
>      to be solved and agreed to make progress.

Again, thanks for another summary!

>   4) In the immediate moment we still have problems in VFIO, RDMA, and
>      DRM managing P2P transfers because dma_map_resource/page() don't
>      properly work, and we don't have struct pages to use
>      dma_map_sg(). Hacks around the DMA API have been in the kernel for
>      a long time now, we want to see a properly architected solution.

What kind of a fix is needed to dma_map_resource()/dma_unmap_resource() 
API to make it usable with P2P DMA? It looks that this API is closest to 
the mentioned dma_map_phys() and has little clients, so potentially 
changing the function signature should be quite easy.

Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland